Categories
Recent Posts
- Meaningful Harassment Training
- Put it in Writting
- Get A Receipt: How to stop employee misappropriation
- Focus on the Wins
- HALLOWEEN EDITION: CUES TO CALL A LAWYER
Archives
- December 2023
- October 2023
- May 2023
- February 2023
- October 2022
- August 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- January 2022
- June 2021
- May 2021
- December 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- October 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
Picking Bad Fights
Posted on April 26, 2017 in Consulting
Employers often spur challenging litigation or government investigations by picking a fight with a former employee over an unworthy issue. The fight might involve an employee taking something that does not belong to them and typically not of any real value (e.g., a uniform or some small company tool). Similarly, a business may feel compelled to send a cease and desist letter with no intention of filing suit to enforce the non-compete the employee signed. Perhaps the most common dispute relates to docking an employee’s final paycheck and soon thereafter the DOL appears for a random audit or OSHA shows up for an inspection.
Today I write to discuss some tips employers should consider before they send a letter that spurs a former employee to pursue a claim in court or with a government agency.
Call the Lawyer First
If your thinking this advice results in more work for me and obvious self-promotion, not true. In reality, I have for twenty plus years frequently persuaded clients to make choices that avoid litigation and decrease legal fees. A 30 minute conversation with your attorney can generally pinpoint the concerns that might warrant an employer backing off a petty issue to avoid a real fight.
Know Your Exposure
Nearly every DOL audit, and subsequent review of overtime obligations, comes from an anonymous phone call to the DOL from a disgruntled former employee. The DOL never pays any attention to the integrity of the caller. The government could not care less that the employee, by way of example, was smoking marijuana while driving or stole from the company. (Both are true stories.) Thus, an employer needs to think about whether it is prepared to open its time records and payroll before launching into a controversy against an angry former employee.
Likewise, many EEOC Charges of Discrimination stem from fights employers start. One extreme example proves my point. A client forwarded an EEOC Charge with allegations of sexual misconduct so detailed that I was embarrassed to have it lying on my desk. The Charge was filed long after the employee quit and within 30 days of the company sending her a letter informing her that she should not be in communication with clients of her former employer. The company was not intending to fight the non-solicitation of clients provision and only wanted to scare the woman away from competing. It did not bode well for the employer.
Assess the Potential Gain
Employers need to know what they want to achieve and be committed to the position before they start a battle with a former employee. Having the last word or trying to send a message is rarely a worthy purpose. The business should assess the real cost of the fight and be willing to engage in the war, not the battle.
The Lesson: slow down and think before you poke a former employee.