Categories
Recent Posts
- A Better Way to Limit the Overuse of Noncompete Agreements
- NAVIGATING THE EEOC’S RECENT REGULATIONS ON THE PREGNANT WORKERS FAIRNESS ACT
- Meaningful Harassment Training
- Put it in Writting
- Get A Receipt: How to stop employee misappropriation
Archives
- August 2024
- June 2024
- December 2023
- October 2023
- May 2023
- February 2023
- October 2022
- August 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- January 2022
- June 2021
- May 2021
- December 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- October 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
Never Demote
Posted on March 3, 2022 in Consulting
In the 28 years of practicing employment law, I have never recommended an employer demote an employee as a form of corrective action. I have many times said what I’m telling you now: never demote. While demotion may be an effective tool in the military, in my opinion, it has no productive place in the private sector. Here are my three reasons employers should avoid and reject demotion as a form of disciplinary action.
- Demotions sets bad precedent.
My job involves telling a story to the jury that explains, first, why an employer terminated the plaintiff, and second, how the decision was consistent with company policy and practice. The task can be difficult without good written records. But imagine the elected challenges if the employer has a practice or history of considering demotion as an alternative to termination. In that situation, the employer not only has to prove termination was supported by the facts but must also explain why it did not consider demotion.
Tip: If an employer eliminates the demotion option, it makes the choice between final written warning and termination easier.
- Demotion is a way of kicking the problem down the road.
A demoted employee nearly always gets a new boss. The theory is that maybe under different management and a new role the employee will emerge successful. It’s a nice thought but not a realistic result. A boss, unwilling to make the difficult termination decision recommends the employee get a new job in the form of a “transfer”. As you might imagine, when the story gets to me, the employee is on their third boss who got snookered into thinking the employment relationship could be salvaged.
Tip: The manager who recommends demotion typically needs coaching on how to successfully manage the employment relationship.
- Nothing good for the employee.
I cannot imagine a more humiliating way to treat an employee other than demotion. Reprimands are private. A termination removes the employee from the workplace. Demotion tells everyone that an employee was not suitable for a role.
Thought: Demotion might make a boss feel better about not firing an employee, but it does little for an employee’s long-term success.