Categories
Recent Posts
- Meaningful Harassment Training
- Put it in Writting
- Get A Receipt: How to stop employee misappropriation
- Focus on the Wins
- HALLOWEEN EDITION: CUES TO CALL A LAWYER
Archives
- December 2023
- October 2023
- May 2023
- February 2023
- October 2022
- August 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- January 2022
- June 2021
- May 2021
- December 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- October 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
Quality Documentation
Posted on March 2, 2016 in Consulting, Employment Litigation
There is an old adage in HR: document, document, document. A better motto is good documentation beats a bad claim. Only well written documentation matters when an employer is trying to win an unemployment claim, fight off a claim by a former employer, or, in the most extreme scenario, to convince a jury that it acted appropriately.
Let me demonstrate my point with a typical scenario. A client forwards me a demand letter from a lawyer representing a former employee claiming wrongful termination. My first focus turns to the personnel file. I hope to find documentation that stands on its own to explain the rationale for the employee’s termination that I can voluntarily send to the lawyer so that he understands his client’s allegations are irrelevant. The easiest way to knock the wind out of a blowhard plaintiff’s lawyer is to freely share with him evidence that his case is far weaker than he hoped. More often than not that will come from a personnel file.
Well written personnel decisions have the following characteristics:
- Signed and dated by the author;
- Relies on objective facts (examples where appropriate), not opinions or speculation;
- Cites to appropriate detail (the relevant event, date of incident, witnesses);
- Explains the investigation that occurred to support the conclusion;
- References applicable rule or policy and perhaps attaches it;
- Identifies prior discipline if applicable;
- Provides employee opportunity to sign and state his/her defense.
Consider the alternative scenario. I get a demand letter alleging wrongful termination and my client forwards me a personnel file with a few “check box” form without any elaboration. The checked boxes fail to tell the story. I have to set up a conference call with the supervisor to provide detail, assuming, of course, he still works for the client and still recalls the situation. The opposing lawyer will request the personnel file, and I either volunteer it or leave him speculating that my refusal to share is a sign of weakness. Now my client has to consider the costs of defending a claim and, most likely, starts debating what it will cost to defend a potential suit. All because of the lack of quality documentation.
Keep it simple and teach your managers the significance of well written documentation.